Rats and Black Death in "Nosferatu"

Renfield from "Dracula" Browning 1931

"Rats! Rats! I see them! Thousands of them! Millions of them..."

This line from the original 1931 Dracula movie, starring Bela Lugosi, is where Refield is anticipating his "master" Dracula's arrival hopeful that he will give him larger creatures for a meal of blood in payment for his loyalties.

No rats were shown in this film. An armadillo shuffled across screen in one early scene, which, in retrospect, could have gotten the skin to crawl if you didn't know what it was, as it does look like a giant rat on steroids!
In the 1922 silent film Nosferatu, starring actor Max Schreck--whose ghastly make-up changed throughout the film to make him more horrifying as the film progressed--did have a scene which depicted rats crawling around on the ship. In fact there is a whole scene of rats crawling out of a hole, and over a shipmate's feet. Very creepy stuff for 1922!

Max Schreck as Count Orlock in Nosferatu

Why were rats either mentioned or depicted in these films, when in the novel, Dracula, none are mentioned?

In Nosferatu, the film follows the original book by Bram Stoker. In fact so much so, that Stoker's widow brought suit against Murnau and won. His company folded. (The court had ordered that the original negatives and prints be destroyed--fortunately this never happened!) Murnau had to change things in order to comply.

So, Count Orlock arrives in Bremen (northern Germany), on board the ship, after killing the crew, and upon his debarkation, fear arises that the plague has arrived in the city. The whole idea was to drum in the fact that the count was the very personification of pestilence and death, so the relationship with rats, disease, and death are pulled together with a scene of long lines of coffins carried by men down a town street. And a man marking each door where people have died of the plague--so that no one goes in, I suppose.

It is further drilled home in a line by Van Helsing in the film: "I have long sought the causes of that terrible epidemic, and found at its origin and its climax the innocent figures of Jonathon Harker and his young wife, Nina." This makes Jonathon and Nina central and very important in the rolls they play. Nina having to make a most horrifying decision to allow the vampire stay with her the whole night until dawn, so that the sun would destroy him, thus ending this horrible plague. She is the ultimate heroine of the film.

Unarguably, rats play a roll in the revulsion factor for an audience who is new to the silent movies. Seeing these creatures scurry across the ship man's feet probably had women in the audience screaming, or hiding their eyes back then! Director F.W. Murnau, had to change the film, as he plagiarised the novel. Thus, I think bringing in the rats may have been a stroke of genius when it was shown, because it is still rather creepy to watch.

Count Dracula/Count Orlock both travel to England on a ship. And everyone knows that rats jump on board, and when it docks, off they go onto shore. Rats carry the flea which carried the Black Plague, and is how it had been spread--mostly and most devastatingly in the 14th century. The plague bacillus originated in the steppes of Central Asia, and traveled the trade routes opened up by the Mongols, reaching Constantinople in 1347. It wiped out whole towns, cities--wherever there was a population. Very few places were spared and there was no known cure. In fact this is where the common saying "Bless you" came from. Back then, if you sneezed, you were most surely going to die. And a worthless medical faculty in Paris claimed that the plague was cause d by "bad air", and had become the most widely accepted theory of the times.

Most people infected died within 2 - 7 days after infection. In some cases the infection went to the lungs, making breathing difficult. The name, "Black Death" comes from the gangrene on areas of the body in infected people. In others an inguinal bubo, which are swollen lymph glands (buboes) often occurred in the neck armpit and groin.

Hand showing acral gangrene due to plague

When one reads about how all of Europe was nearly wiped out during the 14th century, one can understand why it was used in this film. Bodies piled up so quickly that they could not bury them fast enough. Plus, no one understood what was killing them. How more horrifying can you get?

So, in the film Nosferatu, where people are dying and the scene shows men carrying casket after casket down the street in somber procession, the viewer understands that Count Orlock is basically spreading the plague.

I understand the revulsion factor in placing rats into this movie, and the duality of death by plague as a way to make this movie as horrifying as ever to audiences! The bite of the infected flea, or the bite of the vampire--in either case you would die, point taken! Nosferatu, is still considered one of the most terrifying versions of Dracula known even today.

Resources: pictures etc.Wikipedia; Films: Muranu's Nosferatu-1922; Dracula-Browning, 1931; Books: In Search of Dracula, 1972; The Atlas of Medieval Man, 1979; The Vampire Book, the Encyclopedia of the Undead,1979; Dracula by Bram Stoker

VAMPIRES: The GOOD, The BAD and the UGLY!

Three vampires and each a little different. Vampires we've learned over time differ because readers and fans differ. We don't all like the same things.

Who says fictional monsters can't differ? Yes, we have our purists and that's fine but variety is the proverbial spice of life.

I would say I go for the Dracula as depicted by Gary Oldman in the brilliant Coppola film, Dracula. That characterisation is for me completely. We get to see a before to the character: how he came to be the way he came to be!

Purists (myself included when the mood suits) will say that the horrifically monstrous vampire, Nosferatu, as depicted in the film (s) by the same name is the Dracula.
I say if you take Nosferatu's creature and you blend him with say Gary Oldman's or even Bela Lughosi's, you will get the Dracula that I happen to think Bram Stoker envisioned.

Now, Edward Cullen has an entirely different appeal as does Nosferatu. Edward Cullen and the handsome boy vampires as depicted in Twilight and Vampire Diaries are something else again, but these books (and film) although 'cross overs' in many ways do tend to be aimed at the Young Adult market.

I say why not, too? If teens enjoy reading about their own take on vampires, why shouldn't they? Reading is reading after all, and who knows where that interest in vampires will lead? There will be budding authors among them who will quite possibly redefine their own vampires in fiction they might go on to write.

Let all the undead flourish in their own way! 'Live' and let 'live,' I say! And why not?

Vampire lore is all around us. They are the part of legend from all over the world. Every culture has stories of these strange beings.

They exist because we do, because man has always dreamed of things impossible, things different from himself. I think it is our yearning to overcome death, to defeat it and live forever that vampires exist at all.

You see, if you think of it, the one real nightmare that does exist is Death. So why not try to defeat that spectral kill-joy with undead creatures that can tell Death off?

Oi! YOU! Death, hop it!